Autores/as

  • Marcos E. Kauffman University of Buckingham – UK
  • Marcelo Negri Soares Centro Universitário de Maringá - Unicesumar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25245/rdspp.v6i1.444

Resumen

Biografía del autor/a

Marcos E. Kauffman, University of Buckingham – UK

PhD Researcher at Coventry University – UK; Graduate in Law LLB (Honours) at University of Buckingham – UK; Centre for Business in Society – Faculty of Business and Law; Coventry University, 113A Gosford Street, Coventry CV1 5DL

   

Marcelo Negri Soares, Centro Universitário de Maringá - Unicesumar

Post Doctor in Law at UNINOVE/USP. Doctor and Master in law at PUC-SP.  Law Professor at Uninove. Law Professor at PUC-Rio. Member of IBCJ and Cientist at Depac/BSGI. Researcher at the Fundação Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Fapesp). Lawyer, Accountant and Speaker.

 

Citas

Article 29 Working Party (2007) Opinion 4/2007 on the concept of personal data. Available via European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/index_en.htm. Accessed 16 May 2018

Article 29 Working Party (2012) Opinion 05/2012 on cloud computing. Available via European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/documentation/opinionrecommendation/index_en.htm. Accessed 16 May 2018

Article 29 Working Party (2014a) Opinion 05/2014 on anonymization techniques. Available via European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/documentation/ opinion-recommendation/index_en.htm. Accessed 16 May 2018

Article 29 Working Party (2014b) Opinion 8/2014 on the recent developments on the internet of things. Available via European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/index_en.htm. Accessed 16 Jul 2017

Ashton K (2009) That ‘Internet of Things’ Thing. RFID Journal. 22 June 2009. http://www.rfidjournal.com/articles/pdf?4986. Accessed 17 Jan 2018

Bartolini C et al (2016) Cloud providers viability: how to address it from an IT and legal perspective? Economics of grids, clouds, systems, and services. In: Altmann J et al (eds) International Conference on Grid Economics and Business Models (GECON), Cluj-Napoca, September 2015.

Lecture notes in computer science, vol 9512. Springer International Publishing, p 281

Bradley J et al (2013) Embracing the internet of everything to capture your share of $14.4 trillion. Cisco, http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/about/ac79/docs/innov/IoE_Economy.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2018

Cisco (2013) The internet of everything and the connected athlete: this changes … everything. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/mobile-internet/white_paper_c11-711705.html. Accessed 21 Jan 2018

Clarke A, Kohler P (2005) Property law: commentary and materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Custers B, Uršič H (2016) Big data and data reuse: a taxonomy of data reuse for balancing Big Data benefits and personal data protection. International Data Privacy Law 6(1):4–15

Dvorak J, Moving Wearables into the Mainstream - Taming the Borg, 2008.

Ernst and Young (2015) Becoming an analytics-driven organisation to create value. http://www.ey.com. Accessed 10 Jan 2017

European Commission (2011) Privacy and data protection impact assessment framework for RFID applications. 12 Jan 2011

European Commission (2014) Data protection impact assessment template for smart grid and smart metering systems (‘DPIA template’). Expert group 2 smart grid task force. 18 Mar 2014

European Commission (2016) Commission staff working document, advancing the internet of things in Europe, SWD(2016) 110 final

European Commission (2017) Building a European data economy, communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, The European Economic and Social

Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2017) 9 final

Gartner (2016a) Forecast: wearable electronic devices, Worldwide. 19 Jan 2016

Gartner (2016b) Top strategic predictions for 2017 and beyond: surviving the storm winds of digital disruption. 14 Oct 2016

Hoeren T (2014) Big data and the ownership in data: recent developments in Europe. Eur Intellect Prop Rev 12:751–754

Kemp R (2014) Legal aspects of managing big data. Comput Law Secur Rev 30(5):482–491

Lessig L (1999) Code: and other laws of cyberspace. Basic Books, New York

Malgieri G (2016a) “Ownership” of customer (big) data in the European Union: quasi-property as comparative solution? J Internet Law 2016:3–18

Malgieri G (2016b) Trade secrets v personal data: a possible solution for balancing rights. Int Data Privacy Law 6(2):102–116

Mattei U (2000) Basic principles of property law: a comparative legal and economic introduction. Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2008) Committee for Information, Computer and Communications Policy (ICCP). RFID radio frequency identification OECD policy guidance: a focus on information security and privacy applications, Impacts and Country Initiatives

Purtova N (2015) The illusion of personal data as no one’s property. Law Innov Technol 7(1): 83–111

Robert Scoble, Yes, Google Glass Survives a Wet Shower (available at https://plus.google.com/+Scobleizer/posts/TcaqNeYJWXo#+ Scobleizer/posts/TcaqNeYJWXo).

Samuelson P (1999) Privacy as intellectual property? Stanford Law Rev 52:1125–1151

Schwartz Pa M (2003) Property, privacy and personal data. Harvard Law Rev 117:2056–2128

Stephen S. Intille / Amy M. Intille, New Challenges for Privacy Law: Wearable Computers that Create Electronic Digital Diaries, MIT House_n Technical Report, September 15, 2003

Victor JM (2013) The EU general data protection regulation: toward a property regime for protecting data privacy. Yale Law J 123(2):513–528

Publicado

2018-07-18

Cómo citar

Kauffman, M. E., & Soares, M. N. (2018). Revista Direitos Sociais E Políticas Públicas (UNIFAFIBE), 6(1), 512–538. https://doi.org/10.25245/rdspp.v6i1.444

Número

Sección

DOUTRINAS ESTRANGEIRAS

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a