IDEOLOGICAL ORGANIZATIONS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN FRANCE AND BRAZIL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25245/rdspp.v9i2.885Palabras clave:
Ideological Organization, Comparative Law, Labor Law, Globalization, Jurisdictional Power.Resumen
The research aims to analyze how Ideological Organizations are juridically treated in France and in Brazil though a comparative study. As it will be show, Ideological Organizations are those entities created to defend an ideology, such as churches, political parties, labor unions, religion organizations, etc. In those organizations, different from what normally occurs in labor relationship, the employer can compel his employees to have conducts inside and outside the workplace that are similar with the ideology that the Organization defends. It is an exemption from what normally occurs in French and Brazilian labor relations. In French this legal institute is well applied by Courts, promoting stability, despite the fact that is not expressly regulated by the law. In Brazil, in the other hand, there is no legal certainty because the institute is not recognized by the labor law and, as a result of that, Courts significantly diverge while judging labor claims involving Ideological Organizations. The research is performed trough a deductive method.Citas
ARNOULT-BRILL, Edith; SIMON, Grabrielle. Le Fait Religieux Dans L’Entreprise. Journal Officiel de la République Française. Mandature 2010-2015, Séance du mardi 12 novembre 2013. Available at: https://www.vie-publique.fr/sites/default/files/rapport/pdf/134000762.pdf. Visited in: 12 jul. 2020.
BADIOU, Alain. Ethics. Translated by Peter Hallward. London: Verso, 2011.
BELMONTE, Alexandre Agra. Ministro Alexandre Agra Belmonte fala sobre a liberdade de expressão no trabalho. Tribunal Superior do Trabalho. 18/11/2012. Available at: http://www.tst.jus.br/noticias-teste/-/asset_publisher/89Dk/content/ministro-alexandre-agra-belmonte-fala-sobre-a-liberdade-de-expressao-no-trabalho/pop_up?_101_INSTANCE_89Dk_viewMode=print. Visited in: 15 jul. 2020.
BORGES, Jorge Luis. “’Averroës’ Search”. Collected Fictions. Translated by Andrew Hurley. New York: Penguin, 1998 [1947], pp. 235-241. Available at: https://posthegemony.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/borges_collected-fictions.pdf. Visited in: 16 jul. 2020.
BRAZIL. Consolidação das Leis do Trabalho. Decreto-Lei n. 5.452, de 1º de maio de 1943. Available at: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/Del5452.htm. Visited in: 10 jul. 2020.
BRAZIL. Tribunal Regional do Trabalho (10ª Região). Recurso Ordinário n. 00735-2014-002-10-00-5. Sessão de julgamento em 29/06/2016.
BRAZIL. Tribunal Regional do Trabalho (9ª Região). Acórdão n. 0001691-12.2013.5.09.0004. Relator Dr. Archimedes Castro Campos Júnior. Sessão de 08/10/2015.
CARDUCCI, Michele. Crítica de la comparación constitucional “ad hoc”. A&C – Revista de Direito Administrativo & Constitucional, Belo Horizonte, ano 14, n. 55, p. 13-22, jan./mar. 2014. Available at: http://www.revistaaec.com/index.php/revistaaec/article/viewFile/101/304. Visited in: 16 jul. 2020.
COULIBALY, Ibrahim. L’Affaire baby loup: quelles suites juridiques? Village de La Justice – La communauté des métiers du droit, jul. 2014, Available at: https://www.village-justice.com/articles/affaire-Baby-Loup-quelles-suites,17346.html. Visited in: 14 jul. 2020.
D’IRIBARNE, Philippe. Les Immigrés de la République. Paris: Le Seuil, 2010.
DERRIDA, Jacques. Mémoires. Paris: Galilée, 1998.
DIMOULIS, Dimitri. Objetivos e métodos do direito comparado e peculiaridades do direito constitucional comparado. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Constitucionais – RBEC, Belo Horizonte, ano 10, n. 35, p. 77-88, maio/ago. 2016.
EUROPEAN UNION. Directive 2000/78/CE from Consul of November 27, 2000. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PT/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32000L0078. Visited in : 15 jul. 2020.
EUROPEAN UNION. Directive 92/45/CE from Consul of September 22, 1994. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PT/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A61995CJ0314. Visited in: 15 jul. 2020.
FAVELL, Adrian. Philosophies of Integration. New York: Palgrave, 2001.
FERRARI, Regina Maria Macedo Nery. Direito Constitucional. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2011.
FRANCE. Cour de Cassation. Assemblée plénière, 25 juin 2014, 13-28.369.
FRANCE. Cour de Cassation. Chambre Sociale. Audience publique du 20 novembre 1986, n. de pourvoir 84-43243.
FRANCE. Cour de Cassation. Chambre Sociale. Audience publique du 17 avril 1991, n. de pourvoir 90-42636.
FRANCE. Cour de Cassation. Assemblée Plénière du 16 juin 2014 à 14 heures 30. Pourvoi n. E13-28.369. Available at: https://www.courdecassation.fr/IMG/Avis_PG_pleniere_140625ano.pdf. Visited in: 16 jul. 2020.
FRANCE. Labor Code. Article L. 1131-1 and following. Available at: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCode.do?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006072050. Visited in: 16 jul. 2020.
FRANCE. May 10, 2007 Law. Loi tendant à lutter contre certaines formes de discrimination. Available at : http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/cgi_loi/loi_a1.pl?DETAIL=2007051035%2FF&caller=list&row_id=1&numero=13&rech=21&cn=2007051035&table_name=LOI&nm=2007002099&la=F&chercher=t&dt=LOI&language=fr&fr=f&choix1=ET&choix2=ET&fromtab=loi_all&sql=dt+contains++%27LOI%27+and+dd+%3D+date%272007-05-10%27and+actif+%3D+%27Y%27&ddda=2007&tri=dd+AS+RANK+&trier=promulgation&dddj=10&dddm=05&imgcn.x=48&imgcn.y=9#LNK0008. Visited in: 16 jul. 2020.
FRANCE. Feuille fédérale n. 24 du 19 juin 1984. FF 1984 II 574. Message concernant l’initiative populaire pour la protection des travailleurs contre les licenciements dans le droit du contrat de travail et la révision des dispositions sur la résiliation du contrat de travail dans le code des obligations, du 9 mai 1984. Available at: https://www.amtsdruckschriften.bar.admin.ch/viewOrigDoc.do?id=10104045. Visited in : 16 jul. 2020.
FRANCE. Penal Code. Article 225-1 and following. Available at: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCode.do?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006070719. Visited in: 16 jul. 2020.
FRANKENBER, Gunter. Critical Comparisons: Re-thinking comparative law. Harvard International Law Jornal, v. 26, n. 2, p. 411-456, Spring 1985.
GASPAR, Gabriela Curi Ramos. As organizações de tendência e a relação com seus trabalhadores. Publica Direito. Available at: http://www.publicadireito.com.br/artigos/?cod=f0d48bde60d407c4. Visited in: 14 jul. 2020.
GORDLEY, James. When is the use of foreign law possible: a hard case: the protection of privacy in Europe and the United States. Lousiana Law Review, v. 67, n. 4, p. 1073-1102, 2007. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6205&context=lalrev. Visited in: 15 jul. 2020.
HACHEM, Daniel Wunder. A dupla titularidade (individual e transindividual) dos direitos fundamentais econômicos, sociais, culturais e ambientais. Revista de Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia, Curitiba, v. 14, n. 14, p. 618-688, 2015. Available at: https://revistaeletronicardfd.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/rdfd/article/view/505. Visited in: 14 jul. 2020.
LEGRAND, Pierre. A impossibilidade de “transplantes jurídicos”. Cadernos do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito – PPGDir./UFRGS, Porto Alegre, v. 9, n. 1, p. 11-39, jan./jul. 2014. Available at: https://seer.ufrgs.br/ppgdir/article/view/49746. Visited in: 13 jul. 2020.
LEGRAND, Pierre. Como ler o direito estrangeiro. Tradução de Daniel Wunder Hachem. São Paulo: Contracorrente, 2018.
LEGRAND, Pierre. Foreign Law as Self-Fashioning. JCL, v. 12, n. 2. Available at: https://pierre-legrand.com/finself-fashioning.pdf. Visited in: 15 jul. 2020.
LEGRAND, Pierre. On the singularity of law. Harvard International Law Journal, v. 47, n. 2, p. 517-530, 2006. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1069.1889&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Visited in: 13 jul. 2020.
LEGRAND, Pierre. Siting Foreign Law: How Derrida Can Help. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, v. 21, p. 595-629, 2011. Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1021&context=djcil. Visited in: 15 jul. 2020.
LEGRAND, Pierre. Tracing the French Statute on Religious Dress School. Available at: https://pierre-legrand.com/tracing-the-french-statute.pdf. Visited in: 16 jul. 2020.
LEWICKI, Bruno. A privacidade da pessoa humana no ambiente de trabalho. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2003.
LHEUREUX, Guillaume. Le Concept de Vie Personnelle du Salarie. Mémoire de Doit Social. Année universitaire 1999-2000. Available at : http://yvon.jaouen.free.fr/FF1-couple-sexe-et-travail/limite-vie-privee-prof/Ref06-Lheureux-Memoire-DEA--concept-vie-personnelle.pdf. Visited in: 13 jul. 2020.
LOCKE, John. Carta acerca da Tolerância. São Paulo: Victor Civita, 1983.
MARRARA, Thiago. Método comparativo e direito administrativo: breves reflexões por ocasião da criação da Associação Brasileira de Direito Público Comparado. In: BACELLAR FILHO, Romeu Felipe; HACHEM, Daniel. (Org.). Direito público no Mercosul: intervenção estatal, direitos fundamentais e sustentabilidade. 1 ed. Belo Horizonte: Fórum, 2013, v. 1, pp. 151-160.
MERCOSUR. Social-Labor Declaration. Negotiating meeting. Brasília, 17 de julho de 2015. Available at: http://www.itamaraty.gov.br/pt-BR/notas-a-imprensa/10519-declaracao-sociolaboral-do-mercosul-de-2015-i-reuniao-negociadora-brasilia-17-de-julho-de-2015. Visited in: 14 jul. 2020.
MINISTÈRE DU TRAVAIL. Les notions-clés du fait religieux dans le entreprises privées. Fait religieux en enterprise. Guides et Notions-clés. Available at : http://travail-emploi.gouv.fr/droit-du-travail/relations-au-travail/pouvoir-de-direction/guide-du-fait-religieux-dans-les-entreprises-privees/article/les-notions-cles-du-fait-religieux-dans-les-entreprises-privees. Visited in: 16 jul. 2020.
NASSIF, Rafael Carmezim. A relação de emprego nas Organizações de Tendência. Revista de Direito UFV, v. 6, n. 1, p. 193-209, 2014. Available at: https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/1559/0. Visited in: 12 jul. 2020.
NETO, Manoel Jorge e Silva. Proteção constitucional dos interesses trabalhistas. São Paulo: LTr, 2001.
PAGNERRE, Yves. Session FNISASIC. 26 & 27 janvier 2017. Available at: http://www.fnisasic.asso.fr/fichiers/professeur_yves_pagnerre.pdf. Visited in: 16 ju. 2020.
ROMITA, Arion Sayão. Direitos fundamentais nas relações de trabalho. São Paulo: LTr, 2009.
SAMPAIO, José Adércio Leite. Direito à Intimidade e à Vida Privada. Belo Horizonte: Del Rey, 1989.
SARMENTO, Daniel. Direitos fundamentais e relações privadas. Rio de Janeiro: Lúmen Juris, 2006.
SETUBAL, Alexandre Montanha de Castro. Aspectos Interdisciplinares e Jurídico-Trabalhistas do Direito Fundamental à Liberdade Religiosa. 248f. 2011. Dissertação (Mestrado). Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito da Universidade Federal da Bahia. Salvador, 2011. Available at: https://repositorio.ufba.br/ri/bitstream/ri/10721/1/Alexandre.pdf. Visited in: 12 jul. 2020.
SILVA, José Afonso da. O estado Democrático de Direito. Revista de Direito Administrativo, Rio de Janeiro, v. 173, p. 15-34, 1988. Available at: http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rda/article/view/45920/44126. Visited in: 12 jul. 2020.
WAQUET, Phillippe. L’entreprise et les Libertés du Salarié. Paris: Éditions Liaisons, 1992.
WHITMAN, James Q. The two western cultures of privacy: dignity versus liberty. The Yale Law Journal, v. 113, p. 1151-1221, 2004. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1647&context=fss_papers. Visited in: 12 jul. 2020.
ZWEIGERT, Konrad; KOTZ, Hein. An Introduction to Comparative Law. 3. éd. Trad. Par Tony Weir, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1998.
